Search This Blog

Wednesday, June 17, 2026

Jason Gibbs - illegal public comment time limits

Jason Gibbs, retired librarian. 

Coming to these meetings again, I sometimes feel a bit like Rip Van Winkle. I last participated in commission meetings in the early 1990s. It may seem quaint now, but back then when we opened the meetings by standing up, placing our hands over our hearts, and pledged allegiance to the flag in the Lurie Room - yes, that Lurie family. This gesture of solidarity of commissioners and the public took 15 seconds.

Out of curiosity, I recently had the notion to research the evolution of the bylaws of the Commission. One statement has remained in the bylaws. "The commission shall hold meetings open to the public and encourage the participation of interested persons." Attending these few meetings, I have seen that each of you is accomplished, intelligent, dedicated, attentive, and wants to support the library and its users. I hope you would assume that the interested persons who attend these meetings share your outlook. There was always a barrier of sorts between the public and the government and the exhortation to encourage participation is the way to lower that barrier.

In the searly 1990s, when I began attending meetings, the bylaws stated no time limit for public comment. By the mid-90s, the commission adopted a 4-minute time limit, which by the end of the decade dropped to three minutes. In March 2024, the commission acted to amend the bylaws. Four present members of the Commission cast votes to do so. The current amended bylaws continue to state that each member of the public can address the commission for up to three minutes. 
 
The bylaws are a legal document vetted by the city attorney's office. Every meeting I've attended, the commission has violated its own bylaws. Bylaws that current commissioners approved. If you cut me off before three minutes have transpired, you are violating your own rules. You must either follow your bylaws or amend them. The public should learn the rationale for limiting public participation. If you amend the bylaws to shorten the time limit, you could also amend the statement about encouraging participation. But I cannot believe that you really want to discourage participation.

The people who stand on this side of the microphone are not the enemies of the library or of the Commission.

Commission President Wolf illegally interrupting [2 minutes have transpired]: 

Thank you for your comments.

Jason Gibbs
 
Everyone here supports the San Francisco Public Library. Thank you. 

Commissioner Wolf:  

Any further public comment? Seeing there's no further public comment, public comments closed. I just want to thank everyone for participating so actively today and passionately.
SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSION

Minutes of theRegular Meeting of DECEMBER 18, 2025

The San Francisco Public Library Commission held a regular meeting DECEMBER 18, 2025, atthe Koret Auditorium, Main Library and virtually on Zoom.

The SFPLCommissionmeeting was called to order at 4:30 PM.

Commissioners Present: Wolf, Huang, Lomax Ghirarduzzi, Lopez, Bolander, Jones and Calhoun. President Wolf presented the ancestral homeland acknowledgement ofthe Ramaytush Ohlone.
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT

Public Comment

Peter Warfield, Executive Director of Library Users Association: Libraryusers2004@protonmail.com, PO Box 170544, San Francisco California 94117-0544, said the author talk was the fullest he has ever seen it, there was a lot of interest and he got a clear impression from the author of the book; she was not neutral about AI.

Emily Garvie, Executive Director, Friends of the Library: congratulated the Library for the One City One Book program and said the Friends is wrapping up its Annual Fund appeal and Mission Branch renovation campaign is in the home stretch.

Nicky: said Public Comment is perfunctory and he is not supportive of AI or the Library promoting it.

Jason Gibbs, former SFPL Librarian: Coming to these meetings again, I sometimes feel a little bit like a Rip Van Winkle. I actively participated in Commission meetings in the early 1990s. It may seem quaint now, but back then we opened the meetings by standing up, placing our hands over our hearts, facing the flag in the Lurie Room in the old building (yes, that Lurie family), and reciting the Pledge of Allegiance. This gesture of solidarity between commissioners and the public took 15 seconds. 

Out of curiosity, I recently had the notion to research the evolution of the Bylaws of the Library Commission—particularly concerning public comment. One statement has remained constant in the bylaws: “The Commission shall hold meetings open to the public and encourage the participation of interested persons.” Attending these past few meetings, I have seen that each of you is accomplished, intelligent, dedicated, and attentive, and truly wants to support the library and its users. I hope you would assume that the “interested persons” who attend these meetings share your outlook. There is always a barrier of sorts between the public and government, and the exhortation to “encourage participation” is the way to lower that barrier. In the early 1990s, when I began attending meetings, the bylaws stated no time limit for public comment. By the mid-1990s, the Commission adopted a 4-minute time limit, which by the end of the decade dropped to 3 minutes. In March 2024, the Commission acted to amend the Bylaws. Four present members cast votes to do so. The current amended Bylaws continue to state that each member of the public can address the Commission “for up to three minutes.” 

The Bylaws are a legal document vetted by the City Attorney’s office. Every meeting I have attended, the Commission has violated its own bylaws— bylaws that current commissioners approved. If you cut me off before 3 minutes have transpired, you are violating your own rules. You must either follow your bylaws or amend them. The public should learn your rationale for limiting public participation. If you amend the bylaws to shorten the time limit, you could also amend the statement about encouraging participation. But I cannot believe that you really want to discourage participation. The people who stand on this side of the microphone are not enemies of the library or of the Commission. Everyone here supports the San Francisco Public Library.

AGENDA ITEMNO. 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES – NOVEMBER 20, 2025

Peter Warfield said he is concerned about the Library’s continual shrinking of privacy of the patrons, and he commented on a variety of other issues.

Jason Gibbs said there have been complaints of the minutes of the meetings have been brief and he looked up in the city charter what are required of minutes. Public comment 67.16 says that a summary of each statement should be included, that varies from one line to 5 lines. I don't know that is being violated here.

Commission Discussion

Motion: Motion by Commissioner LOMAX GHIRARDUZZI to approve the minutes with three changes seconded by Commissioner LOPEZ to approve the NOVEMBER 20, 2025, Commission Minutes.

Action: AYES 7-0 (Wolf, Huang, Lomax Ghirarduzzi, Lopez, Bolander, Jones and Calhoun)

AGENDA ITEM NO.3 FYS 2027 & 2028 ANNUAL BUDGET

Mike Fernandez, CFO, presented an overview of FYs 2027 & 2028 Budget Priorities including the three phases of the Budget process, the Budget calendar, how the priorities align with Vision 2030, the Budget environment and revenue outlook.

Public Comment

Jason Gibbs said the presentation was great, page 14 is interesting, and is curious about services of other departments, how that works and asked for cost savings breakdown and where the zero number for equipment came from.

Peter Warfield said he was stunned by $8 million in the category of community programs and partnerships and remember when they broke 1 million and they were amazed by that and asked about improving access to print of all kinds including improvements in the catalog and the speed with which print arrives.
Commission Discussion

Commissioner Bolander said there is a2.5 million delta between the approved budget and the estimate, the funding seems worse than last year.

Fernandez said they are seeing at the end of the last year there was a lot of momentum over there and all indications that it will continue. A lot of larger events are happening in the city and the surrounding areas that are onetime events that would indicate a good reason for positive outlook.

Vice President Huang asked what numbers on slide 15 could potentially change next time.

Fernandez said 27 through 29 will get revised as they get new information.

Commissioner Calhoun asked about the delta between full employment and actual employment. Where would they see that in the presentation.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 CITY LIBRARIAN’S REPORT

Michelle Jeffers, Chief of Community Programs and Partnerships, presented on the SF Drag Laureate and the Drag Story's 10th Anniversary. The 2025 Drag Laureate, Per Sia, was the first reader to perform a Drag Queen Story Hour a decade ago. They hosted the 10th Anniversary celebration at the Main Library, which included multiple story hours happening throughout the day, a parade through the building, crafts, play, food, and fun. Ten years ago, the City Librarian and Deputy recognized the importance of delivering and celebrating this community with an innovative and inclusive idea that was brought to the Library by Radar Productions. The Library does this because Drag Queen Story Hour sparks imagination and serves audiences with joyful, glamorous, and proudly queer role models. Kids are particularly able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions, and they can be their authentic selves. City Librarian Michael Lambert reported on his trip to Taiwan at the invitation of the National Taiwan University Dean of the School of Learning and the Graduate Institute of Library and Information Studies. He served as the keynote speaker for the Library Association of the Republic of China (Taiwan) conference and visited many of the newly constructed and most innovative libraries in Taiwan, which are far ahead of SFPL. The reason they invited SFPL is because of how our libraries operate as social infrastructure—anchoring our communities, fostering shared experiences to bring our community together, encouraging civic engagement, amplifying culture, and celebrating diversity.

Public Comment

Peter Warfield said he wondered how books are pushed out from a vending machine device and asked where people browse the books, noting that's one of the ways people find materials of interest.

Jason Gibbs said he had the opportunity to go to National Taiwan University to present a paper, though he never made it into the library. He noted that Taiwan is a very impressive society and that they do not have some of the societal problems that we experience here in terms of its public. It is a very different society.

Commission Discussion

Commissioner Lopez congratulated Jeffers, noting that this work is challenging. She stated that Jeffers does a great job, does not give up, and keeps pushing; her initiative in dealing with everything the process entails is not easy, as there are people in this world who do not have an open mind. She also thanked the City Librarian for representing the San Francisco Public Library across continents, noting it is inspiring to learn what other libraries are doing. Commissioner Calhoun said the ten years of history is remarkable and asked where that history lives. Jeffers stated that the Hormel Center is the keeper of that history.

Commissioner Lomax Ghirarduzzi said Jeffers was the best in the nation, noting that no one does community work like her.

Commissioner Jones said it was incredible what Jeffers does during these moments where the Library is making history. As the budget gets leaner, he asked how one doubles down and leans into history-making moments—focusing on being the best at a few things versus doing many things. He also wondered about the role of merchandise when celebrating these milestones. Commissioner Jones thanked Lambert for showing them incredible libraries across the world, noting it pushes the Commission forward.

AGENDAITEM NO. 5 2026 COMMISSION MEETING CALENDAR Public Comment

Peter Warfield stated that cutting the second meeting in February is a pity and noted that there is no break in the summertime.

Commission Discussion

Motion: Motion by Vice President HUANG to approve the 2026 Commission Meeting Calendar seconded by Commissioner CALHOUN.

Action: AYES 7-0 (Wolf, Huang, Lomax Ghirarduzzi, Lopez, Bolander, Jones and Calhoun) 

AGENDAITEM NO. 6 ELECTION OF 2026 OFFICERS

Public Comment

Peter Warfield stated that it is a pity the Commission does not have nominations prior to public comment, as this requires members of the public to address everyone generally rather than speaking to specific nominees. Commission Discussion

Commissioner Lopez nominated President Wolf to be the 2026 Commission President, which Wolf accepted. Action: AYES 7-0 (Wolf, Huang, Lomax Ghirarduzzi, Lopez, Bolander, Jones and Calhoun)

Vice President Huang thanked the Commission for the opportunity to serve and nominated Commissioner Calhoun as the 2026 Vice President; the nomination was accepted by Calhoun.

Action: AYES 7-0 (Wolf, Huang, Lomax Ghirarduzzi, Lopez, Bolander, Jones and Calhoun)

THE MEETING ADJOURNED at 6:23 PM

Margot Shaub, Commission Affairs Analyst

Commission Affairs Analyst, Main Library, San Francisco, CA 94102-4733

Monday, June 15, 2026

Latin X Affinity Center - Sunshined documents

NEW - Latinx Affinity Center Programming 25-26.pdf

NEW - LatinxAffinityShelving.pdf

Project Charter Latinx Affinity Center

Katrin Reimuller to Dolly Goyal 092724 Latinx Affinity Center draft Project Charter.pdf-redacted.pdf

Katrin Reimuller to Dolly Goyal 091724 Follow up from Latinx Center meeting.pdf

Katrin Reimuller to Dolly Goyal 091724 FW_ Follow up from Latinx Center meeting.pdf-redacted.pdf

Francisco Cardona to Lisa Valerio 100424 Re_ Latinx Affinity Shelving possibilities.pdf-redacted.pdf

Lisa Valerio to Irene Aquino 111424 Re_ LatinX & Deaf Services Scoping Meeting.pdf-redacted.pdf

Latinx Center update.docx-redacted 0326

Brian Weaver to Naomi Jelks 032126 FW_ Latinx Center SPI update and weeding directive.pdf-redacted.pdf

Michael Lambert to Dolly Goyal 032426 FW Latinx Center SPI update and weeding directive.pdf-redacted.pdf

Brian Weaver to Michael Weaver 033026 RE_ Latinx Affinity Center project meeting33036.pdf-redacted.pdf

Brian Weaver to Michael Lambert 033026 RE Latinx Affinity Center project meeting.msg-redacted.pdf

Brian Weaver to Michael Lambert 033026 RE_ Latinx Affinity Center project meeting.pdf-redacted.pdf

Lisa Valerio to Naomi Jelks 043026 Re_ LatinX Center - Linear Feet shelving.pdf-redacted.pdf

Lisa Valerio to Naomi Jelks 043026 LatinX Center - Linear Feet shelving.msg-redacted.pdfFrancisco Cardona to Naomi Jelks 050126 Latinx center info.msg-redacted.pdf

Graham Galloway to Naomi Jelks 051026 Executive Sponsors SPI Update Form Submitted.msg-redacted.pdf

HC Weed and Shift Progress Report.docx-redacted.pdf 110425

Library Projects - Main and Branches Attachment (LIB - DWP projects- .xlsx)

San Francisco Public Library - Main Library - 3rd floor, General Collections and Humanities

Right sizing underway


Tuesday, June 2, 2026

Commentary from the November 20, 2025 Library Commission meeting

Peter Warfield public comment:

I tried to be a little bit discreet about why I was speaking about contingency planning, including the fact that I'd never been to a fire. I've never had a fire drill going on while I was at the library. So, let me tell you, there was a shooting outside that killed one of the people that involved the library's security folks and the library simply announced at about 5:00 on a Friday afternoon that they were closing. And I was sitting at a computer and I asked my neighbor, I said, "Did I understand correctly there?" There was no explanation given. It was completely in a sense chaotic. There was no staff or anybody else telling where to go. There was nobody saying where we should leave in which direction. Nothing. That's why.

Jason Gibbs public comment:

Good afternoon. Jason Gibbs, retired librarian. Sorry to be a bummer, but as Mr. Warfield noted, there was a murder at the public library, at this library. I did some investigation and the events had nothing to do with the library or its service. There were two people having their own beef outside, but that was never communicated to staff. Staff were rightly concerned that we could have had an armed murder inside of the building without any information about it. 

One thing you should know is that our security staff was excellent. One of them tried to stop the bleeding, which was profuse. This was ultimately unsuccessful because the man died even though the City Librarian never sent out notice of this happening. The murdered person was from Urban Alchemy with whom the library has worked with very closely and many staff members feel a close relationship to. They've  actually been a real asset to the library. People who are really serious about turning their lives around. 

That's what makes this event so unfortunate. So when I read about it happening, I thought, is it that guy at the Bridge? I sort of imagined that it was somebody intimately involved the library. Fortunately, it wasn't. 

But it also brings up the fact that library staff are routinely threatened by members of the public. We joke that at least once a week somebody will say to you, after you've told to adjust their behavior,  "I'm going to see you outside." And of course 99.9% of the time that doesn't happen, but it can happen and people are are truly worried and this whole event had a profound effect on staff morale at the Main Library and people feel like there was no leadership. And that the leadership did not really address the concerns of the library staff after this event. Thank you.

"Urban Alchemy worker killed after asking man to stop using drugs outside library" - KTVU.










Thursday, May 28, 2026

Library Commission April 16, 2026 meeting

Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 16, 2026
Location: Main Library, Koret Auditorium; public access via Zoom webinar.
Call to Order: Approximately 4:30PM.

CALL TO ORDER AND LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Commission Affairs Analyst Margot Shaub opened the meeting, explained Zoom and public comment procedures, and the Commission delivered the Ramaytush Ohlone Land Acknowledgement.

ROLL CALL
Present: President Calhoun; Vice President Jones; Commissioners Lopez, Bolander, Kenaston, and Menon (quorum established).

1. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT

Anonymous Citizen — Criticized perceived Commission elitism and disengagement, referencing a prior meeting joke about adjournment; argued Commissioners should welcome engagement; used a racial epithet, and the chair halted the comment.

Anonymous Citizen public comment
Thank you very much, commissioners. Speaking as an anonymous citizen, of course, and stop the hate, stop the ignorance, don't give money to Friends of the Library, don't accept money from the Friends of the Library. And there are no agendas in the back of the room.

Conceive of this as a two-part presentation. The first part today and the second part in May. So to the extent that you're following at all, the conclusion will be in May. At the last meeting, the president of this commission made a joke. He was not trying to be profound or insightful. He thought it was a little witicism with just enough of a hint of the truth to make it funny. Do you remember he said,

"Now we come to the favorite part of my of the agenda adjournment."

He's glad when he thinks it's over. Don't you know in your heart of hearts that if this were a just society, library commissioners would be looking forward to the agenda, would be looking forward to engaging with the public and engaging with people who cared about the library. Of course they would. What does it mean when the library commissioners are the ones who dread the meetings? 

I mentioned before that you attempt to establish your elitism by disain displaying your disdain for power of language because a it it there's an aphorism which demonstrates that the idea that you demonstrate your elitism by your disdain for the public. That aphorism operates on many levels cannot be paraphrased and the phrase is no one hates a field [ __ ] like a house [ __ ] The thing t's it's an aphorism that's existed for a long time. icrophone cut]

Commission Analyst Margot Schaub:
So the legally safest course is to your comment is off topic and I'm stopping your time. So yes. 

Anonymous citizen
No abs...

Commission Analyst Margot Schaub:
Absolutely. Thank you. Okay. Can you turn the mic off, please?

Allison Fong, Friends of the Library Board, — Praised Night of Ideas as dynamic and joyful; announced June 6 Block Party Book Sale; promoted the Friends’ new Hammer Guides collaboration hoodie via the SFPL store.

Jason Gibbs, Retired Librarian — Commended Mission Branch renovation and restoration of Leo Lentelli’s sculpture; described historic significance of Lentelli’s works removed from the old Main; urged retention of valuable collections (e.g., LPs) that might otherwise be lost. 

Jason Gibbs' Public Comment
About three meetings back, we had a nice presentation from the facilities director that went into
Mission Branch in its renovation. And I was very pleased recently to to walk past there and see that the the sculpture there by Leo Lintelli -- two children reading a book -- is looking better than ever. 

Leo Lentelli was a fairly significant part of of San Francisco life for a time. He was part of the City Beautiful Movement that that helped create the San Francisco Civic Center. When you go to Market Street, it's called the path of gold - he designed the light standards that are in the on that path of gold. He had five sculptures at the front of the old Main Library representing art, literature, philosophy, science, and law. When it became an Asian art museum, the iconoclasts of the Asian Art Museum and the Art Commission had them removed and I think they're in some collector's backyard in Contra Costa County,  these fine sculptures.

But that brings me to l the celebration of 30 years of the main library. I was here on the day that we moved in. I was part of the moving process and one thing I remember distinctly from that time is we had a collection of LP records at the old Main Library and we were given instructions by the chief of the new main library to get rid of that collection. At that time I was supervised by a woman who was about as mild-mannered and cooperative a person that you could imagine but she was not going to have that. And so when we moved over, we brought over the LP collection. 

Basically they wanted a new library and a new collection and new technology. But who would suspect now that LPS surpass CDs in sales today? If we had followed her idea for right sizing all of those long playing records would would have been would be in a landfill right now. Nowadays there are genres of music that we can offer like opera, folk music, certain kinds of jazz -- recordings that were created before the vinyl revival that are available to the public that would have been otherwise lost. So when you think about removing collections or moving fast and doing things, you have to consider that the world changes and the values of things change where maybe right now ebooks look like they're doing better than regular books, but you get a lot of reports of how people are returning to print and finding that they want to be disconnected. So I I just to plant the seed of the idea that um that things are sometimes worth holding on to even when they don't seem like like their time has passed.

Peter Warfield, Executive Director Library Users Association, Libraryusers2004@protonmail.com, PO Box 170544 SF, CA 94117-0544 — Requested fairer handling of relevancy during public comment (allowing clarification if time is stopped); criticized SFPL’s promotion of social media citing court rulings and youth harm; urged reconsideration of publicity practices, especially for minors.

Ruben Jaurez, Circulation Supervisor; Union Officer— Thanked speakers for supporting consistent three-minute comment time; recounted essential service roles Library staff took during COVID-19 (food banks, testing sites, hotels, contact tracing); urged alternatives to layoffs for public sector workers. 

Ruben Juarez public comment
Hello, commissioners, management team members, and assembled attendees. My name is Ruben, and I'm the circulation supervisor. I'm the circulation supervisor, union officer, and the union representative on the libraries health and safety committee. First off, I would like to thank Jason for his research, diligence, and ultimately his advocacy, ensuring all future participants have three minutes to speak in this forum. Thank you, Jason, for your resolve. 

Now, I missed the March Commission meeting. That said, I thought I would share what I intended to speak to last month. I thought we'd be remiss if we didn't mark a date that was significant in March. On Friday, March 13, 2020, Mayor Breed began the process of shutting down the city due to a health emergency, the Corona virus. And last month, I wanted to reflect on that day, Friday the 13th. It was a week after the commission meeting, six years later, and how our public sector workers, including a large amount of library staff, responded to the onset of the pandemic. At a time when there was so very little information about the virus, workers stood up when our city was at its neediest. Workers staffed the food bank, food bank popups which were throughout the city, distributed flyers, t staffed testing sites, hotels, the Covid command center, offered translation services, contract contact tracing among other things. 

City workers stood up to provide vital essential services when everything else was shut down. I worked principally at the food bank pop-ups where we worked where we workers bag groceries, distributed food, and managed lines. I chocked the lines measuring the distance between where clients would stand to ensure the six feet distance was maintained. Food insecurity was very real. The desire for food to provide for one's family was an urgent need. 

The image that sits in my head was the day at the Cow Palace where hundreds of people came to get food. Our public service workers showed up and showed out providing essential services showing the right stuff. 

As we are in the midst of layoffs to city workers and other departments, I think it's important to underline what workers did, what public sector workers do when the chips are down. And we ask that our workforce, our public service workers be afforded the same level of 6reciprocity when it comes to finding alternatives to layoffs. Thank you.

ITEM 2 — Approval of February 12, 2026 Minutes

Public Comment

• Anonymous Citizen — Said the February minutes were redrafted but failed to incorporate corrections raised in March; cited omissions (commissioner qualifications, labor emphasis, privacy concerns, staff reporting context); urged inclusion of full public testimony consistent with a data-driven organization.

• Peter Warfield — Asserted misrepresentation or reversal of his comments’ intent; emphasized respect for Commissioners but reiterated concerns about harmful technologies and patron privacy; asked for corrections to prevent mischaracterization.

Commission Discussion/Action : Motion from Commissioner Lopez second from Commissioner Bolander to approve the February 12, 2026 Minutes. Action: Approved unanimously. Roll-call ayes: Calhoun, Jones, Lopez, Bolander, Menon, Kenaston

ITEM 3 — Approval of March 19, 2026 Minutes

Public Comment

• Anonymous Citizen — Argued the ordinance allowing a 150-word speaker summary was misinterpreted; described difficulties submitting the summary (documentation and “include vs. attach” dispute); alleged evasive handling of public submittals. 

• Jason Gibbs — Requested replacing “another speaker” with his name; cited Sunshine Ordinance placement (summary belongs within public comment section, not addendum); asked to avoid further Task Force appeals by correctly acknowledging testimony.

• Peter Warfield — Said addenda disconnect public remarks from agenda items; argued minutes lack item linkage for commenters; reiterated concerns aboutsocial media promotion and prior inaccuracies/omissions.

Commission Discussion: Commissioners confirmed the requested correction (naming Jason Gibbs) and proceeded to vote.

Commission Discussion/Action: Motion from Commissioner Kenaston and second from Commission Jones to approve the March 19, 2026 Minutes with one edit to include Jason Gibbs name.

Action: Approved unanimously with correction

ITEM 4— 2025 Media Analysis Report

Staff Presentation — Public Information Officer Pocheolo Carsi-Cruz analyzed 2025 media coverage (paid/owned/earned); highlighted three themes (library love spectrum, diversity champion, city pride) with examples and early 2026 uptick.

Public Comment

• Anonymous Citizen — Praised the presentation but urged a national shift back to literacy-focused missions; criticized visible disengagement by some Commissioners; requested a stronger emphasis on books, history, and core literacy.

• Jason Gibbs — Commended analysis yet cautioned about PR growth versus frontline service; emphasized libraries as refuge for patrons needing quiet and help; urged balancing “bright, shiny” programming with core service. 

Jason Gibbs' public comment
A very nice presentation. I do have to say that one thing that I've noticed over my career towards the end is just how much energy and staffing has gone into public relations at the library. It really was not a big
thing in the past. And I think the combination of the set aside and the reallocation of public service jobs
towards the sixth floor to work on public relations has created a, I mean I I see it on the news all the time. 

There's a lot to be proud about at the library and I'm sure that you're proud too and that's why you enjoy doing this because there's so much to be grateful that the library does. But, you know they emphasize the loud and lively part because that seems so unlike a library. But that's where this quote from Emily Hovind comes in so well because my experience at the library is feeling the gratitude that we could provide a peaceful safe place for the people of Tenderloin people living in SRO's where they can come in and basically just be left alone and be on their own because they don't really have spaces.

And and I always worry that this overemphasis on the bright shiny stuff detracts from really recognizing and rewarding the everyday stuff. And so like I objectives and key results is one of those things that's spoken about. And again it's a matter have you devoted your institutional energy towards public relations or have you devoted them to actually being there to serve people when they need it. The one day that you need to come in and print out your resume. You don't know how to do it. Well, the the librarian is busy giving a program. You know, it's like you missed out on that person and and so my hope when I worked there was to never miss out on that person wherever they're at to provide them with service and I see the public service positions changed to be more sort of administrative or public relations jobs and I feel like it is going to have an outcome on the objectives and key results.

• Peter Warfield — Reported packet collation issues (upside-down pages, no page numbers); argued SFPL’s media narrative under-represents books/newspapers/periodicals; urged stronger reporting on collections amid declining traditional media.

Commission Discussion

• Lopez — Expressed pride in media attention, commended diverse programming and outreach success.

• Menon — Asked whether coverage correlates with program attendance or materials use; supported next-phase tracking of user pathways.

• Jones — Praised balancing positive/challenging coverage; recommended adding impression metrics and using owned/paid channels to support literacy priority.

• Bolander — Suggested earned-media dollar valuation and sentiment analysis; recommended tracking pitch success.

• Kenaston — Encouraged benchmarking SFPL against major systems(e.g., DC Public Library).

ITEM 5 — Branch Division Report

Staff Presentation — Chief of Branches Rebecca Alcala Veraflor reviewed branch history/renovations (BLIP, LIFT), district organization, multilingual services, and community partnerships; systemwide visits recovered to ~87% of pre-COVID levels with local variation (construction, demographics, staffing).

Public Comment

• Ruben — Spoke to the rewarding nature of branch work and patron relationships; noted safety importance and lack of on-site security at some branches; highlighted staffing challenges for seven-day service.

• Peter Warfield — Warned against “de-bookification”; urged capacity and visibility for book collections; criticized temporary renovation sites for limited use Commission Discussion

• Kenaston — Praised service excellence based on multiple branch visits, clean facilities, organized stacks, positive interactions.

• Menon — Highlighted libraries as teen third spaces amid rising loneliness; asked about low-hanging-fruit improvements, site-specific solutions described.

• Lopez — Commended Council of Neighborhood Libraries and language support; affirmed value of community-led input.

• Jones — Requested future district-level trend reporting and insights to address “stagnant 80” recovery cluster.

ITEM 6 — City Librarian’s Report

Night of Ideas, Michelle Jeffers, Chief Programs and Partnerships — Largest in the U.S.; 7,100 attendees at Main and ~2,500 at Asian Art Museum; 300+ presenters/performers/vendors; extensive staff support.

Main Library 30th Anniversary, Naomi Jelks, Chief of Main — Reviewed 1996 opening and affinitycenter history; programming included “Librarians on Film,” Hormel Center celebration, Civic Center cemetery-history talk, and in-library wedding ceremonies.

Public Comment

• Peter Warfield — Noted discrepancies between versions of
anniversary materials; recounted controversy about book reductions and space reallocation; criticized Night of Ideas for limited discussion of AI downsides.

Commission Discussion: Commissioners praised creativity, scale, and resilience of programming (e.g., astronomy session pivot due to rain); commended leadership and public service.

Meeting adjourned by President Calhoun. At 6:41 PM

Saturday, May 23, 2026

Library Commission May 15, 2025 meeting

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSION

Minutes of theRegular Meeting of MAY 15, 2025

The San Francisco Public Library Commission held a regular meeting May 15, 2025, atthe Koret Auditorium, Main Library and virtually on Zoom.

The SFPLCommissionmeeting was called to order at 4:30 PM.

Commissioners Present: Wolf, Huang, Jones, and Calhoun.

President Wolf presented the ancestral homeland acknowledgement ofthe Ramaytush Ohlone.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT

Public Comment

Stacy Smith said he had an administrative hearing, and the hearing officer did not have access to the appeal and video footage, which countered the incident report.

Peter Warfield, Executive Director of Library Users Association Libraryusers2004@yahoo.com, PO Box 170544, San Francisco California 94117-0544, said there are threats against anyone with the top political person in the country including libraries, which the Commission should consider.

Emily Garvie, Executive Director, Friends of the Library, gave updates of Friends work for the Library including raising $560,000 through the 2025 Laureates event.

Walt Bilofsky, SF Bay Chapter Freedom From Religion said The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence were going to make public comment about SFPL joining Books Unbanned.

Jason Gibbs, who retired from the Library, learned about the strategic plan, which one discussion was of joy and wonder at the Library, which happens when the trained professionals help patrons find the book or item they are looking for, they are astounded by the system.

Comment
My name is Jason Gibbs. I've recently retired from the library, but about a year ago while I was still employed learned a lot about the strategic plan which I was not involved with. one of the things that was very heartening in the discussion was sthe discussion of joy and wonder at the library and I thought I'd tell you a little bit about joy and wonder. 

It's not uncommon that someone will come into the library who doesn't use the library. Somebody will give them a piece of paper with a number for a book on it. They don't know what to do. There are so many books. But then you lead them to the shelf, there it is. And they are just astounded that we have the system where you can find that one book. 

But it's not really magic that does it. It has to do with trained professionals. Somebody had to select the book. Somebody had to negotiate the contract so we could buy the book. The book arrives. We have to do physical processing, cataloging. It has to get transported to the library. Then it gets shelved. then it has a life on the shelf. Somebody has to decide do we keep it, do we withdraw it and um all these things are done by dedicated professionals. 

So it really isn't magic. It's involvement of systems of people who are overlooked and and not really mentioned in all the sort of wonderful things you like to talk about. I feel like you should know that wonderful things are happening among the staff that we have systems in place. we have dedicated people and that the maintenance every day of a collection that serves the public is what we are all dedicated to and um I hope you will be dedicated to.

Ruben Juarez said he was a representative of SEIU, which welcomes the new and returning Commissioners back.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES – APRIL 17, 2025

Ruben Juarez asked for a correction in the minutes.

Peter Warfield said the minutes do not include every time he mentions his contact information and are brief.

Commission Discussion

Motion: Motion by Vice President HUANG to approve the minutes with one edit seconded by Commissioner CALHOUN to approve the APRIL 17, 2025, Commission Minutes.

Action: AYES 4-0 (Wolf, Huang, Jones and Calhoun)

AGENDA ITEM NO.3 PROGRAMMING PERFORMANCE METRICS

Dolly Goyal, Chief of Public Services and Angel Castro, Administrative Analyst presented Library programming and performance metrics, which are aligned with fulfilling vision 2030 Strategic Priorities of Literary Champion, Cultural Amplifier, Community Catalyzer, Thoughtful Navigator and Resource Provider. They highlighted that although programing has not yet returned to pre-Covid levels they are on track to deliver more than 14,700 programs for all ages, a 63% increase for all programs compared to fiscal year 23 which is when they begin to ramp up programming numbers following the pandemic.

[Michael Lambert: I just want to highlight that over for over a decade now, the San Francisco Public Library has been intentional about delivering a more experiential service model, hosting thousands of events, performances, classes, workshops, story times every year, drawing hundreds of thousands of visitors. So this has been a growth area for us as we continue to make the transition from a more traditional service model which has centered around more transactional touch points for our residents.]

Public Comment

Peter Warfield said he generally does not have a problem with what is being presented, but he did not hear about books or anything at all about how to access the tremendously rich collection at the library.

Ruben Juarez said for every program there is preparation for physical preparation that goes into getting the space ready. There is a prep whether it's an in-house program or someone from the outside.

Comment:
Wonderful presentation. I um just wanted to speak to what programs involve. So just to flesh it out and this will be a little granular. 

So for every program there's preparation for it. The physical preparation that goes into getting a space ready. There's a prep for whether in-house prep or somebody coming from the outside.There's a preparation there on the para-professional side which is where I'm at. Working with the talent to make sure they feel comfortable with the physical landscape when they come in. Is there anything we can do to help with the setup? Do we need to put a screen up? So there's a lot involved on that end. 

And obviously there's the the program itself which is always such a such a delightful thing because on our end to see an audience that's happy. Because one of the other pieces we have to do is get the count for how many people are attending the program and then afterwards after the program's over and, you know, thank you for coming, please come back and see us again see you soon, you know, that piece of it. 

There is the breakdown where we had to put everything away. And then the next level which is looking at the program. What could we have done better? What can how can we improve upon it? Are there things that we might have missed? So there's a lot of different elements that go into a program. I'm sharing all this just to I know I'm getting granular. Sharing all this to give you all a sense of what a program entails and the work that's involved in it. And I think when we're being intentional in looking at resources to involve staff in terms of this process would be important given all that happens. Thank you so much.

Jason Gibbs, retired Librarian, said he noticed over the past few years there is an inflation in the demand to give programming to the point where there is conflicting programming that divides up the audience. He said it used to be typical for a program to have 100 people attend.

The one thing I noticed over the past few years is a great inflation in the demand to give programming to the where there's conflicting programming that where you basically divide up your audience and you don't really get the attendance you want. Early in my career, it was pretty typical to have a program in here where 100 people was normal, often more. Nowadays, you know, it's it's hard to bring in that many people. I think because of just the inflation of activity going on. 

The other thing I'm sort of concerned about is this preference of the experiential versus service. I mean I'm old-fashioned, but to me the job is all about service, about being there to serve the public day in and day out to provide them access to the resources of the library. And it it is a telling thing about the strategic plan and and the discussion of all this like Mr. Warfield said that that the book is left out and I guess it is a four-letter word. 

Because there are still people dedicated to the book and I know the staff is too and there's a way I think to follow up. We used to do programming where we would uintroduce databases, how to search the collection but that has all been deemphasized. So I think that that is a worthy goal. Thank you.

Commission Discussion

Commissioner Calhoun thanked staff for the presentation and asked if on the slide with the patron satisfaction where pretty much everything was green, were there things below the fold there may be rated differently. Randy McClure, Chief Analytics, responded that on the topic of programming this is the complete set of questions. Commissioner Jones said the work was incredible and this is the power of the systems working together to make all the programming come to life. She asked that for the data to separate out adult versus youth in the diagnostics, it would help the team understand where some of the pain points are and feel focused about supporting patrons effectively.

Vice President Huang said he is proud of SFPL programming and congratulated to everyone who has done anything r for a single program and would like to understand the framework by which you consider what better means. President Wolf said it is fascinating to notice that youth programs have been cut in half since, and adult programming has doubled, this is a great shift and asked if it was this intentional and how does staff set goals each year for the kind of balance and the kind of participation they want.

City Librarian said coming out of COVID, they were focused on recovery and the restoration of what they had prepandemic. Michelle Jeffers, Chief of Community Programs and Partnerships (CPP) said hiring after the pandemic, as we were down some children's librarians, took some tome to get fully staffed up and adult attendance does reflect online programs, which we don't see kids coming to online programs.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 CITY LIBRIARIAN’S REPORT

Jess Ouyang and Sachiko Iwabuchi, CPP presented highlights of Weaving Stories: Asian American, Native Hawaiian & Pacific Islander Heritage month including curated book lists that connect patrons to library materials, the Asian Pacific Islander American a (APIA) biography project, which includes educating the public about APIA Americans and a website created for K- 12 students and a Sake and Shochu event in partnership with the Consulate- General of Japan. Ruben Balderas, CPP, presented Dia de los Ninos/Dia de los Libros 2025, a celebration of children and books. The first Dia event was held in 1999 and each year since then organizers continue to volunteer time and resources to champion and promote literacy and unite families of all cultures through a community-based child center event. They gave away a thousand children's books in English and Spanish, the annual celebration has distributed over 25,000 multilingual books in the community.

Michelle Jeffers gave highlights from the Jewish American Heritage Month, a new program started this month. Jeffers said this heritage needs to be celebrated in San Francisco and that the Jewish community has been instrumental in this city since gold rush days. The celebrations included a series of family programs, author talks, concerts and workshops.

Public Comment

Peter Warfield said he was glad to hear about programming that included books.

Commission Discussion

Commissioner Calhoun said he agrees that there is a lack of programming around Jewish heritage and asked what kinds of questions they asked about impact as they were putting that programming. Jeffers said they talked to partners before planning any programs to identify what was missing and they are working with a pro bono consultant to bring in more questioning and more evaluation of the programs. City Librarian Lambert said through Vision 2030 and implementing our new strategic plan, part of that process for the upcoming fiscal year is to develop criteria to assess programs success and what to sunset. President Connie Wolf said the public programs are at the core of who the library is in reaching community partnerships and every program is free and accessible.

PRESIDENT WOLF ADJOURNED THE MEETING at 6:01 PM

Margot Shaub, Commission Affairs Analyst

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Success and Strategic Planning - March 21, 2024



Commissioner Susan Mall:

Where are the measurable outcomes? How are we to judge what's happening and if it's if this is successful?




City Librarian Michael Lambert: 

The overriding outcome that we currently strive to achieve will remain the same and that is our resident satisfaction with our services.

Skeptical Commissioner Susan Mall on Strategic Plan - January 18, 2024

Commissioner Susan Mall:

Well, for fear of being thrown off the dais here...

Commissioner Jarie Bolander (off-mic):

I don't think we would do that. I mean it would be very frowned upon.







Commissioner Susan Mall:

It would be frowned upon. 

Commissioner Jarie Bolander:

We're respectful here. 

Commissioner Susan Mall:

Okay, well, I'm very respectful of the work that you've all done and I'm especially respectful of the work the staff has done, period. 

However I was a skeptic going in and I'm still a skeptic, just saying so. 

For my understanding, this is like twelve things too many. I don't understand why there has to be the outer circle, the under circle and then the circle in the middle. 
 
I think it's, you know, you, you covered every little thing the library does. I don't think that's necessary myself. 

I'd much rather see a more focused streamlined elevator pitch, if you will, description of what the plan for the library is 

Some of the language I'm dead set against, like the amplified joy and wonder. Sorry, but it just, it just screams at me that this is - I hate to use the word - silly but, I don't think it reflects the ...  I think people, yes, they feel joy when they're in the library of course and reading. As far as I'm concerned, there's nothing more joyful than reading a great book, frankly. But I think you've expressed that in other areas here. 

The thing that I'm a little disappointed in - that I'm a lot disappointed in - is the things that you use as examples I think are wonderful. The, you know, the information about navigating the neighborhood, the Innovation Hub, the Teen Mental Health Center. I wouldn't even put the Jay-Z exhibit I because that is a oneoff that we can't even replicate here.Sso I wouldn't even, I mean, of course that's fantastic. 

But, the Early Childhood Hub the new immigrant Center, I mean, yes,  these are all wonderful ideas but unless we have a different physical plant, especially right here, it's going to be very hard to implement any of these. 

I think I've mentioned on the commission that I've visited some libraries in Europe last summer where they have all these comfy chairs and I mean everything looks like a living room and you just want to you know sit down and get comfy with your neighbors and your community.

I mean you can barely find a chair to sit in in this Library um and nonetheless a comfortable chair. But I think that many of these ideas, just don't line up with the facts on the ground.  I might have more but those are my initial thoughts.

Monday, May 18, 2026

San Francisco Public Library Commission January 18, 2024 meeting

SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC LIBRARY COMMISSION
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of JANUARY 18, 2024
The San Francisco Public Library Commission held a regular meeting JANUARY 18, 2024, virtually and at the Koret Auditorium, Main Library.
The SFPLCommission meeting was called to order at 4:30 PM.
Commissioners Present: Wolf, Huang, Ono, Mall, Lopez and Bolander.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT

Peter Warfield Executive Director of Library Users Association Libraryusers2004@yahoo.com, PO Box 170544, San Francisco California 94117, said why he gives his contact information.

Glen Rogers, Landscape Architect, said he sent the Commission an article regarding the Oceanview Library and what he believes to be a better location, the IT Berkman Center, and that the Orizaba sight location is unsafe.

Michael-Vincent D’Anella-Mercanti of Friends of the San Francisco Public Library Foundation said Friends smashed their fundraising goals, brought on many new donors to support the Library and they are excited to start 2024 on that note. Friends is hosting its legacy Stong breakfast for people who have entrusted them with personal legacies. They plan to continue to host the Friends Lounge for Night of Ideas. He said they are in full support of the Strategic Planning Initiative and budget process.

AGENDA ITEM NO.2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES – DECEMBER 14, 2023

Public Comment

Peter Warfield said the minutes are deficient and continue systematically to exclude his comments about the toxicity of social media.

Commission Discussion

Motion: By Vice President HUANG seconded by Commissioner LOPEZ to approve the DECEMBER 2023 Minutes. Action: AYES 6-0 (Wolf, Huang, Ono, Mall, Lopez and Bolander)

AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 STRATEGIC PLANNING UPDATE

Gensler Senior Associate, Midori Mizuhara shared the core components of the draft Strategic Planning Process and asked for feedback from Commissioners on clarity of purpose and desired community outcomes. Mizuhara presented the draft Vision of “A Democratic, equitable and vibrant San Francisco for everyone”; draft Mission “Connect our diverse communities to learning, opportunities and each other”; and draft Values of “well-being, equity, community, collaboration and exploration.” The SPI strategic priorities are Literacy Champion, Cultural Amplifier, Community Catalyzer, Thoughtful Navigator and Resource Provider. Mizuhara said to achieve Vision, Mission, Values and Strategic Priorities the organization will undergo shifts in the service model.
 
Public Comment
 
Marciel Gamino Murphy, SFPL Meeting Room Coordinator, said she was incredibly grateful to have been recognized as an ambassador this past year and have the opportunity to participate in the Strategic Planning Process, to collectively understand the direction of the organization and the ambitious goals and objectives they aspire to achieve. Gamino said the inclusivity of everyone in this process fosters a sense of accountability among all to feel deeply connected to the organization mission.

Peter Warfield said he found the plan very problematic and the Library’s existing mission statement is a very nice one, he did not see what was wrong with free and equal access to a variety of things including joys of reading for the diverse community. The Library’s traditional role has always been the education, enlightenment, and entertainment through its collections, which is one of its strongest assets.

Commission Discussion

Vice President Pete Huang thanked the many people for all of their input and work on the Strategic Planning Initiative (SPI) this past year. He said when they started this process, he did not know the last time they updated it was 1996, and this is the right time to do this work. This plan represents so much clarity in what the Library means to patrons, and their experience with the it, the fantastic programs like giving away free books at community events and helping the recently incarcerated enter their post incarceration lives. Huang said that word ‘connect’ shows up so much in this plan because it acknowledges perhaps, for the first time, that this is the reality of the changing natures of libraries across the country and the Library is changing its service model to be in place, where fifteen years ago, that we would not have possible. He said he is excited about the implementation of the SPI, and what they’ll do when they fully recognize the intentionality of the plan.

Commissioner Mall said she is very respectful of the work that has been done and the work of the staff, however she is a skeptic. From her perspective, there are too many things, and she does not understand or think it is necessary to cover everything the Library does and would rather see a more focused streamlined, elevator pitch description of what the plan for the Library is. Mall said she is against some of the language like Amplified Joy and Wonder and the examples given are wonderful, but unless they have a different physical plan, especially right here, it’s very hard to implement any of these.

President Wolf said part of the challenge is to align what they have and these ambitions as part of the movement going forward how do we make that happen.

Vice President Huang said if they don't put aspirational examples, does that end up preventing people from even trying in the first place, he would love for people to try and if they don't get there fine, but it will be work and trade offs, and different ideas or modifications that don't feel like the original inspiration because they are forced to match the dream with what we have, but he would rather try than not.

Commissioner Mall said she is all for aspirational but which of these many things is the priority.
Vice President Huang responded that the SPI gives them a framework to decide amongst a list of projects.

City Librarian Michael Lambert said when they started this the aspiration was to dream big and to develop a bold vision for the future of the Library and that the framework they will then be operating under, is different but not too dissimilar, the biggest change is incorporating this new dimension of internal organizational shifts. The Library has five updated strategic priorities, and the organizational shifts are more internal.

Commissioner Ono asked if the current budget is based on the old strategic priorities and going forward will it be using these new five strategic priorities to build the future budgets and in March will they be changing the Mission and voting on that.

Lambert said that is correct and in March the Commission will vote on the updated Bylaws, which will incorporate the updated mission. Regarding facilities, the reality is they were designed with a different sensibility.

Chief Operating Officer, Maureen Singleton said the next step is a facilities master plan and to do that they need to understand what the service model is for thinking about and trying to achieve how current facilities meet or not that ability.

Mall asked for the goal for facilities changes be included in the strategic plan and if the staff signed off on the Strategic Planning Priorities.

Lambert said the next iteration of the SPI will include information about facilities planning and staff has had the opportunity, throughout, to provide feedback and they will also present this information to the Commission this spring.

Commissioner Lopez thanked the 32 Ambassadors and the team for their work and prefers the language amplify wonder because joy is subjective, it is what they hope the patrons feel but many times the Library serves as a place for non-joyful things and what comes after in the SPI is up to everybody, they need to act on and hold everyone accountable.

President Wolf said the language Spark Curiosity was strong and felt more grounded versus the joy issue. Commissioner Bolander said this is the vision to the promised land and in 20 years they will get there, it takes a lot of effort and one of the things he likes is about trying to visualize it this way. He said the biggest challenge any strategic plan is alignment throughout the entire organization, and he likes the idea of having a big idea of what this is an elevator pitch that encapsulates and goes beyond the vision, mission, and values, brings it to life in a way, that anyone anywhere at any level of the organization can repeat. And the language for amplifying joy and wonder, he thought was from the staff not the patron perspective.

Mall said staff safety is a priority, they can’t be joyful if they are scared to death.

Lambert said this plan was co-created with staff, a bottom-up model and when he when he sees amplified Joy and Wonder, it is from a service model standpoint where every public facing staff member, every staff member, in the organization is an ambassador for the organization.
Michelle Jeffers, Chief of Community Programs and Partnership said staff needs to hear this language and it needs to be one of the foundational statements of what the organization is or it will go by the wayside, it is easy to get caught up in all the important things they do, teaching people computer skills, helping them with re-entry and giving incarcerated individuals books. Staff want them to know that when they come to the Library, they will feel joy.

President Wolf said there is a disconnect between this idea and the language on the page. There are 900 people who are employed at the San Francisco Public Library, over half of the budget is to support those people and they do have an investment to make sure the staff is joyful in their experiences, that is critical. Commissioner Mall said all the Commissioners want people to feel satisfied and happy in their jobs. Gensler said this was a draft, which they will refine, and they appreciated all the comments. They will go back to the drawing board on some issues and have a new iteration soon.

President Wolf thanked the Commissioners for the robust discussion and said the San Francisco Public Library is a leader, they can't forget the leadership role in their communities and around the world, if they do not take that stance of being bold, taking the leap forward and taking a few risks, they are not serving the community. Wolf said, it's providing services but also being very San Franciscan and being bold and forward thinking.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 FY 25-26 BUDGET

Chief Financial Officer, Mike Hernandez gave an update on the FY 25 & 26 Budget, including the budget process calendar and the Mayor’s budget instructions, which included the prioritization of improved public safety and street conditions, economic recovery, reduce homelessness, transform mental health services, further prepare for weakening economic outlook and no new positions. Hernandez said the Library Preservation Fund estimates $0.4 million more than the FY25 adopted budget and expects a 2.2% increase next year. FY 25 & 26 budget priorities include Partnerships for Excellence, Literacy and Learning, Youth Engagement, Organizational Excellence, Digital Strategies and Facilities Maintenance and Infrastructure. Through January they will continue to refine the budget proposal and the Commission will approve the budget in February.
Public Comment

Peter Warfield said he hopes the Library is still following the existing budget priorities and many of the goals mentioned including joy and some of the others and about equity, free equal access, e-books, and paper books, and e-books are not the same, they don’t have the features on the flaps about the book itself and the author, the quotes in the endorsements and so on. They are not accessible to folks who have less or no access to computers.

Commission Discussion

Vice President Huang asked about the investments in the JARS patrons, the per person spending seemed high and when the issue comes up again, he would like to see more data. Shellie Cocking, Chief of Collections said there are 800 beds not patrons in the system, so they might support three people using a bed over a month. It is a new program, four months, they are still assessing costs per month.

Commissioner Lopez asked about the grant that funds the program.

City Librarian Lambert said the grants funds 3 FT temporary staff positions.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 CITY LIBRARIANS REPORT

Anissa Malady, Adult Engagement Coordinator, presented 2024 One City One Book selection, “The Chinese Groove”, by Kathryn Ma, and said there will be an author conversation on May 4, 2024 at the Main Library. Malady said this is the 18th One City One Book San Francisco Reads.

Shawna Sherman, African American Program Manager, African American Center outlined More Than Month: Black History Culture & Heritage programs events and authors, including Music is First! Band performance by Bryan Dyer and Sareen Poonenn Levien at the Parkside and Richmond Branches, Artist Charles Dabor Creating Collage Art event and the On the Same Page selection of On the Rooftop by Margaret Wilkinson Sexton.

Public Comment

Peter Warfield said it’s always terrific to hear about programs and what resources there are, and he wished databases were on the Agenda.

Commission Discussion

President Wolf said she and Commissioner Mall both love serving on the One City One Book, and they have started already for next year. Wolf encouraged everyone to read the book and attend the May 4th event.

Commissioner Ono said she read the Chinese Groove, it is amazing and More Than a Month, an entire year of what the Library does with African American black history month, she really enjoys the innovative programming.

AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ADJOURNMENTOF THE JANUARY 18, 2024 COMMISSION MEETING

Public Comment

Peter Warfield said the Commission should have an item on its Agenda at the end of the meeting for future agenda items that they would like to see on the agenda and asked about what is measured when the Library mentions circulation, he hears how popular e-books are but is concerned there is a thumb on the scale to make those numbers look bigger.

A Public Commenter said this was their first time ever doing this, thanked the Commission for being so open about this and being very precise in what they say and how they discuss, allowing everyone to voice their opinion and they were glad they came today.

Commission Discussion

Motion: By Commissioner MALL seconded by Commissioner ONO to adjourn the meeting.

Action: AYES 6-0 (Wolf, Huang, Ono, Mall, Lopez and Bolander)

The meeting adjourned at 6:25 PM

Margot Shaub, Commission Affairs Analyst

Thoughtful Navigator - only a euphemism?

Jason Gibbs - comment at the March 19, 2026 Mid-Year Progress Report

I long had trouble conceptualizing the euphemism "Thoughtful Navigator." So I turned to AI and got a very inspiring answer from Grok. Here's a long quote. 
It's someone who treats navigation as an ethical and intellectual practice rather than a mechanical task. They plan rigorously but remain flexible. The map is not the territory. Anticipate ripple effects. What happens two steps or two decades downstream. 

Listen to the environment and to other people instead of imposing a preconceived route. 

Find beauty and meeting in the process itself, not just in arrival. 

You see this quality in the quiet sailor who double-checks the log at 3:00 a.m., the leader who asks, "What are we missing?" before committing a team, the parent who guides a child without controlling them, or the researcher who follows curiosity wherever it leads while still keeping the bigger question in view. 

In short, to be a thoughtful navigator is to steer, not by force or fear, but by attentive presence. It is the art of moving wisely when no one else can see the full picture yet. 
Vision 2030 purports to apply this to a library service, but it should apply even more toward leadership culture of the San Francisco Public Library where everything is top down. Everything is very siloed. They wallow in numbers. Big numbers good, small numbers bad. And in fact, they only know staff and their contributions through numbers. And of course, nobody ever considers the possibility of the future harm their visions may cause. 

Moving to one of the specifics in the Vision 2030 report, there was a mention of training. The staff training and development committee Stadcom [The Staff Development Committee] has been in hibernation for a while. It consists of a chair and nobody else. There's apparently no funding for staff to attend workshops or sessions at conferences. The library cannot provide coverage to staff to attend the trainings they want within the library and city or even provide adequate time to take online or pre-recorded training. 

So staff asks, they continue to ask, "How can the library support us in attending professional conferences and taking professional level workshops so we can stay informed and relevant?" They also don't understand what it means when you report says of staff development projects that "two are in flight and two are completed." 

It's actually rather kind of traumatizing to some of us to hear in the building-in-flight because during our service as Disaster Service Workers, we were constantly being told that we were building the airplane as we were flying it. And what that meant is we were in the middle of a huge, confusing anxiety producing mess. 

But the library is not in a disaster emergency. It has had established systems that worked and these have been replaced only by a vision. 

Public Comment by an Anonymous Citizen - August 20, 2026

GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT Thank you very much, Commissioners.  Speaking as an anonymous citizen: Stop the hate. Stop the ignorance. Don't g...